Has blamed violently in the parable of the ongoing court battle for enterprise to battle Lord officer of Samsung Electronics products Apple, on rectangular.
"Our rectangle we are it's reason for not fighting on the reasonable and we defended ourselves has been considered as copyright infringement" said Kevin Packingham wired.com.
Mr. Packingham is if the Court "logic to provocation" and said.
"In some cases in the industry most of us sense, challenged that" he said.
"We all of us head wounds and ' how it has industry-level discussions, it is possible to try to impede competition and do? ' And say.
"You can provide product to the rectangular shape rectangle consumer wants and we somehow fighting"
Mr. Packingham is related to Apple's intellectual property rights, "the rectangle does not come from r & d investments we have made" said to focus on.
Not consider that happens the rectangle part of the our products, art or we have created Science said.
Reach may result far across the technology industry trials began today,.
If Apple succeeds, Samsung and must pay a penalty count 1 billion dollars, and would be banned from some consumer gadgets of the trademark of import countries around the world. Apple victory also precedent of other technologies company-at least they strictly design, infringe on Apple patents without restricted in the ability to sell a Smartphone or Tablet set in the United States you can find.
It also can run the Apple monopoly consumer technology.
Wired full q & A read.
No comments:
Post a Comment